Емайлы

[tijd.livejournal.com]

Анализ сообщений прессы во время предвыборной кампании 2016, опубликованный Columbia Journalism Review, подтверждает то, о чем многие писали ранее - тема емайлов Клинтон в традиционных СМИ вроде New York Times забила собой все остальные темы, внеся вклад в искаженное восприятие избирателей.

Clinton-related email scandals—her use of a private email server while secretary of state, as well as the DNC and John Podesta hacks—accounted for more sentences than all of Trump’s scandals combined (65,000 vs. 40,000) and more than twice as many as were devoted to all of her policy positions.
https://www.cjr.org/analysis/fake-news-media-election-trump.php

Карма посмеялась над Мишей “Lock her up” Флинном с его “if I did a tenth, a tenth of what she did, I would be in jail today”. После того, как федеральный судья по его делу взял самоотвод, судьей для Флинна был назначен Эммет Салливан, в своё время номинированный Биллом Клинтоном.
https://www.politico.com/story/2017/12/07/michael-flynn-judge-sentencing-287001



В прошлом году судья Салливан внес свою лепту в скандал с емайлами Клинтон, председательствуя по делу о ее почтовом сервере, возбуждённом консервативной группой Judicial Watch.

In a brief ruling issued on Friday afternoon, the judge, Emmet G. Sullivan of Federal District Court in Washington, approved a motion by the conservative advocacy organization Judicial Watch to pursue its vigorous campaign to expose Mrs. Clinton’s use of the private server. In addition to requiring her testimony in writing, the judge allowed the group to depose a senior State Department aide who had warned two subordinates not to question her email practices.
https://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/20/us/politics/hillary-clinton-judge-emails.html

Прозрачная цель Judicial Watch была добиться показаний Клинтон, чтобы попытаться поймать ее на вранье под присягой, а также просто продолжить шум про емайлы задолго после того, как ФБР закрыло расследование.

Judicial Watch’s strategy is simple: Carpet-bomb the federal courts with Freedom of Information Act lawsuits. A vast majority are dismissed. But Judicial Watch caught a break last year, when revelations about Mrs. Clinton’s private email server prompted two judges to reopen two of the group’s cases connected to her tenure as secretary of state.
The lawsuits have since led to the release of hundreds of Mrs. Clinton’s emails — which have, in turn, spurred dozens of news releases and fund-raising letters from Judicial Watch that hype the significance of these documents, while putting them in the least flattering light possible for Mrs. Clinton.
The group’s lawyers were given permission to depose several of her senior aides from her time at the State Department. What is more, Mrs. Clinton herself will have to answer 25 detailed questions about her use of a private email server as secretary of state.
https://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/13/us/politics/judicial-watch-hillary-clinton.html

( Read more... )